Beta-Cyclodextrin Confers Penicillin Resistance in an Alkaliphile
Paul de Figueiredo1*, Becky Terra1*, Jasbir Kaur1,2, Ana Lenskiy1,
Martin Sadilek3, Sen-Itoroh Hakomori2 and Gene Nester1#
* With Equal Contribution
# To whom correspondence should be sent.
gnester@u.washington.edu
1. Department of Microbiology, Box 357242, University of
Washington, Seattle, WA 98195
2. Pacific Northwest Research Institute, 720 Broadway, Seattle,
WA 98122
3. Department of Chemistry, University of Washington, Box 351700,
Seattle, WA, 98195-1700
4. Department of Biochemistry, Teikyo University School of
Medicine, Kaga 2-11-1, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo 173-8605
We recently demonstrated that beta-cyclodextrin (bCD) glycozyme
activity mediates the hydrolysis of penicillin antibiotics in a model
biological system containing an alkaliphilic Bacillus species (ATCC
21594) [1]. Here, we show that cyclodextrin participates in
mediating penicillin resistance in this organism. When growing at its
optimum pH (10.2) under nutritional conditions where it synthesizes
cylcodextrin, the bacterium is resistant to penicillin. Under
conditions where cyclodextrin synthesis is inhibited, the bacterium
becomes sensitive to this antibiotic. A mutant strain with
defects in cyclodextrin production is also penicillin-sensitive. These
data therefore demonstrate that bCD glycozyme activity plays a
physiological role in mediating antibiotic resistance in this model
system.
The cyclodextrins are cyclomaltooligosaccharides containing six
(alpha), seven (beta), or eight (gamma) a 1-4 linked glucose residues
[2] and are a carbon and energy source for a variety of bacteria.
In addition, bCD possesses the remarkable capacity to catalyze assorted
chemical reactions in non-biological in vitro systems [3]. We recently
extended these studies by demonstrating that bCD can catalyze the
hydrolysis of penicillin in vivo in a model biological system
containing an alkaliphilic Bacillus species (ATCC 21594). The chosen
Bacillus strain thrives in alkaline conditions and produces large
amounts of extracellular cyclodextrins [4]. In addition, it grows
in the absence or presence of starch. bCD is produced under the
former, but not the latter, conditions [4]. Therefore, starch
provides a convenient and natural switch whereby bCD-mediated glycozyme
activity may be manipulated in vivo. In previous studies,
we exploited this fact to show that bCD directly catalyzes the
hydrolysis of penicillin in vivo [1]. However, the role that bCD
glycozyme activity plays in conferring penicillin resistance to this
Bacillus strain remained unexplored. Here, we address this issue by
demonstrating that cyclodextrin mediates penicillin resistance in this
alkaliphile.
We employed two methods to assay ABPC resistance in this model
system. First, we added various amounts of the antibiotic to
early log phase cultures and then assessed bacterial growth by
measuring the optical density of cultures at various times after
antibiotic addition. This assay allowed us to determine the
concentration of antibiotic that inhibited growth by 50% (IC50).
Second, we measured halos around antibiotic disks placed on culture
plates harboring Bacillus cells. By measuring the distance from
the edge of a disk to the point at which bacterial growth is first seen
provided us with a reliable method for assessing antibiotic resistance
[5].
When cultures were grown in the presence of rich or minimal liquid
media containing starch, ABPC resistance (IC50 = ~400mg/ml and
~450mg/ml) was observed (Fig. 1A). Similar resistance was
observed on solid media (clearance = 3.3mm) (Table I). However, when
cultures were grown in the absence of starch, this resistance was not
seen (IC50 = 7mg/ml; clearance = 8.1mm) (Fig. 1A and Table I).
Importantly, starch did not induce resistance to non-b-lactam
containing antibiotics, including erythromycin, streptomycin, and
rifampin (IC50 = 10mg/ml; clearance = 2 mm) (Fig. 1B and data not
shown), and cultures grown in the presence of galactose, lactose,
raffinose, and arabinose did not display an antibiotic resistance
phenotype (Fig. 1C). Moreover, the degree of resistance was directly
correlated with the amount of starch (and hence bCD) present in the
culture media (Fig. 1D). Finally, starch-dependent antibiotic
resistance was seen in both defined minimal media and rich media (Fig.
1A). Taken together, these observations were consistent with the idea
that starch (but not other carbon sources) (Fig. 1C) stimulated
production of a specific and dose-dependent resistance to ABPC.
We asked whether the activity conferring ABPC resistance was soluble
and secreted into the bacterial culture media. To address this
question, we examined Bacillus conditioned media derived from cells
cultured in the presence or absence of starch. When Bacillus
cells were cultured in control starch-free conditioned media, no
significant ABPC resistance was observed (IC50 = 7mg/mL) (Fig.
1E). However, when conditioned media derived from starch cultures
was employed, a dramatic ABPC resistance phenotype was seen (IC50
= 400 mg/mL) (Fig. 1E). We found that the activity
conferring antibiotic resistance was not destroyed when conditioned
media derived from starch cultures was boiled for 30 min, suggesting
that a protein was not responsible for the activity. Previous
work demonstrated that the activity was not detected in whole cell
extracts, or supernatants derived from cells cultured in the absence of
starch, using standard chromogenic assays for b-lactamase activity
[1]. Moreover, previous PCR experiments using Bacillus genetic
material as a template failed to detect the b-lactamase genes present
in common laboratory bacterial strains [1]. Finally, the Bacillus
strain was sensitive to ABPC (IC50 < 7 mg/ml) when grown in the
absence of starch (Fig 1A). These observations were consistent
with the hypothesis that a heat-resistant factor present in conditioned
media derived from cells grown in starch (but not glucose alone) was
responsible for conferring the ABPC-resistance phenotype.
We next added pure bCD (5mM) to Bacillus cultures grown in the absence
of starch and found that bCD-supplemented cultures were significantly
more resistant to ABPC (IC50 = 450mg/mL; clearance = 1.7mm) than
controls lacking the added oligosaccharide (IC50 = 7mg/ml) (Fig. 1A,
Table I). These data suggested that bCD synthesized in the
presence of starch was responsible for mediating the observed
antibiotic resistance. The data did not, however, indicate
whether bCD was mediating the effect directly, or inducing the
synthesis of the material responsible for the resistance.
Subsequent experiments were therefore aimed at obtaining genetic
evidence that would clarify its role.
We examined the antibiotic resistance phenotype of strains harboring
defects in bCD production and employed the powerful chemical mutagen
ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) to generate Bacillus mutants with defects
in bCD production. Colonies were screened on bCD-indicator plates
harboring phenolphthalein and methyl orange dyes [4, 6].
Promising candidates were retested on bCD indicator plates (Figs. 2A),
and their culture supernatants were also tested for bCD content by
HPTLC and reverse phase HPLC (data not shown). One strain, BT13,
was found to consistently display deficiencies in bCD accumulation
(Fig. 2). An analysis of BT13’s ABPC resistance phenotype
revealed that it was significantly more sensitive to ABPC than WT
controls when grown in the presence of starch (WT IC50 = ~400mg/mL;
BT13 IC50 = 9mg/mL) (Fig. 1F). Importantly, the addition of pure
bCD (but not glucose) to glucose- or starch-grown BT13 cultures
conferred ABPC-resistance (IC50 = ~450 mg/ml; Fig. 1F). Taken together,
these data indicated that bCD was directly mediating the ABPC
resistance phenotype.
To further explore this possibility, we examined ABPC resistance in a
heterologous and well-characterized Bacillus subtilis system. B.
subtilis provided a convenient gain-of-function system for these
studies because the organism is known to be sensitive to b-lactam
containing antibiotics, and can grow under mildly alkaline conditions
(pH 9.1). In addition, bCD-producing (ALKO 2279) and control
(ALKO 2013) strains are available [20]. We therefore compared the
ABPC resistance phenotypes of bCD-producing and non-producing strains.
We found that ABPC resistance was conferred to non-bCD producing
strains grown on alkaline solid media (clearance = 21.3 mm) but not its
non-alkaline counterpart (clearance = 12.8 mm) (Table IB). In addition,
bCD-producing strains grown in liquid media harboring starch were more
resistant to ABPC (IC50 = 345 mg/ml) than controls grown in the absence
of this carbon source (IC50 = 75 mg/ml). Importantly, the
addition of pure bCD to non-producing cultures conferred an ABPC
resistance phenotype (Table IB), consistent with the idea that bCD was
responsible for this activity. Finally, our HPTLC analysis
confirmed previous findings [20] demonstrating that bCD accumulates in
large quantities (1.8 mM) in ALKO 2279 cultures grown in the presence
of starch. Therefore, these “gain-of-function” data supported the
idea that bCD was directly participating in mediating the observed
antibiotic resistance.
Our results suggest a novel role for bCD glycozyme in antibiotic
hydrolysis and resistance in an alkaliphile. In addition, because
cyclodextrin-producing alkaliphiles may encounter antibiotics
containing b-lactam rings in their natural environment [7], our results
indicate that bCD-mediated g___o____ activity may constitute a
physiologically relevant antibiotic resistance mechanism. Finally, it
will be of interest to examine other alkaliphiles for bCD production to
see whether this property correlates with ABPC resistance
Figure Legends
Figure 1. bCD mediates antibiotic resistance. A. Bacillus
(ATCC 21594) was grown in rich or minimal medias in the presence or
absence of starch and bCD. The log phase doubling times for untreated
cultures, and IC50s for ABPC were then determined as described.
B. The IC50s for ABPC (AMP), rifampin (RIF), erythromycin (ERY), and
streptomycin (STR) were determined for WT and BT13 cultures grown in
the presence of starch. RIF, ERY, and STR (but not AMP) lack
b-lactam rings. C. The IC50s for ABPC were determined for WT
Bacillus cultures grown in minimal media in the presence of the
following carbon sources: starch, lactose, galactose, raffinose,
and arabinose. D. Increasing the starch:glucose ratio increases
the IC50. Cells were grown in media containing several starch:glucose
ratios. The IC50s were calculated from 16-hour readings.
E. WT Bacillus cells were grown in conditioned media mixed 1:1
with unconditioned media. AMP was added and the IC50 was
determined as described. F. Addition of pure bCD to glucose-containing
non-bCD-producing BT13 cultures rescues the BT13 AMP sensitivity
phenotype. All data represent the average of at least 6
replicates.
Figure 2. bCD phenotypes of WT and BT13 cells. A.
Untreated bCD indicator plates are red, but turn yellow when incubated
in the presence of bCD. WT Bacillus cells were streaked
onto indicator plates containing glucose (and lacking starch) (1) or
containing starch alone (2). BT13 cells were streaked onto an
indicator plate containing starch (3). Pure bCD powder was
sprinkled onto an indicator plate containing glucose and lacking starch
(4). All plates were photographed after 48 hours of incubation at
37∞C. B. Protein extracts were obtained from (1) ~106 TOP10
E. coli cells harboring a plasmid (pBAD-TOPO 2.1) containing a protein
b-lactamase gene, and (2) 109 Bacillus (ATCC 21594) cells. These
extracts were spotted to the center of LB plates containing 10mg/mL
AMP. Plates were then streaked with AMP-sensitive B. subtilis
cells (ALKO 2013), incubated at 37°C and photographed after 24
hours.
Table I. bCD confers AMP resistance to the alkaliphilic Bacillus
strain (ATCC 21594) (A), and B. subtilis (ALKO 2013) (B) on solid media
at containing glucose or starch. Antibiotic discs containing AMP
(10 mg/ml), ERY (10mg/ml), STR (10mg/ml), or RIF (10 mg/ml) were added
to plates streaked with Bacillus (ATCC 21594) or B. subtilis.
Zones of antibiotic clearance were measured from the outside of the
disc to the closest colony. The Bacillus sp. experiments (A) were
performed at pH 10.2, the B. subtilis experiments were performed at pH
7.0 or 9.1 as indicated. All data represent the average of at least 6
replicates.
Supporting Online Material
Materials and Methods.
References.
References and Notes
1. 1st paper (de Figueiredo, Kaur, Terra, et al., XXX, 2004)
2. Szetjtli, J. 1998. Chem. Rev. 98: 1743-1753.
3. For review, see Bender and Komiyama. Cyclodextrin Chemistry.
Springer-Verlag. 1978. NY.
4. Park, CS et al. 1989. Agric Biol Chem. 53:
1167-1169.
5. Bauer et al. Am J Clin Pathol. 1966 45:493-6.
6. Taguchi. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986. 108: 2705-2709.
7. Kato, C., et al. Arch. Microbiol. 1989. 151: 91-94.
8. The authors would like to thank Drs. Milton Gordon, Jim
Staley, D. Ellis Monks, Marion Brodhagen, and members of the Nester,
Hakomori, and Gordon laboratories for their comments and remarks, and
Dr. Carlos Semino for stimulating discussion during the early stages of
this work. Emily Lee and Adonis Acuario provided expert technical
assistance. This work was supported by a National Science
Foundation Small Grant for Exploratory Research (MCB-0135592) and a
National Institutes of Health Research Grant (GM 32618) to G. N.,
an X grant ( ) to S.-I. Hakomori, a Y grant ( ) to T.
H, and an American Cancer Society postdoctoral fellowship to P. d. F.